Authorization testing
Object-level and function-level access control probed across every role and tenant boundary — the flaw class behind most real API breaches.
Cybersecurity · Security Testing
Modern products expose more logic through APIs than through any UI, and API flaws — broken object-level authorization, mass assignment, unbounded queries — don't show up in web scans. We test APIs the way they're attacked: as programmable business logic.
API breaches are quiet and complete: no browser, no alarms, just enumerable IDs and data leaving at machine speed. By the time misuse shows in metrics, the dataset is already gone.
Object-level and function-level access control probed across every role and tenant boundary — the flaw class behind most real API breaches.
Injection classes, deserialization, and schema-validation gaps across REST, GraphQL, and event endpoints.
Rate limits, workflow bypasses, replay, and enumeration — the attacks that are legal HTTP and illegal business.
Token handling, JWT validation, key management, and session lifecycle — where one mistake is total compromise.
01
API inventory from specs and traffic — including shadow endpoints.
02
Manual assessment aligned to the OWASP API Security Top 10.
03
Findings with working repro requests.
04
Fix verification, updated report.
We ran a structured security assessment across 300+ endpoints — authentication, authorization, rate limiting, and injection classes — with findings ranked by exploitability.
Case studies →Yes — the assessment is structured around the OWASP API Security Top 10, with particular focus on broken object- and function-level authorization, the flaw class behind most real API breaches.
API discovery works from specs and live traffic, so shadow and internal endpoints exposed by frontend scripts are mapped and tested, not just the documented surface.
Yes. Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested' — the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.
Engagements run under NDA. Findings and reports are shared through channels agreed at scoping and are not retained beyond the period needed to deliver and support the engagement. Data-handling specifics — storage, encryption, retention, and destruction — are documented in your service agreement; see the Trust page for our current posture.
A 30-minute call with the engineers who will do the testing — not a sales gate.